Anyways.... this is one of my all-time favorite topics, on which I could go on forever, but I will try really hard to keep this short and to the point.
One of media's favorite cyborgs. |
Enter the present day cyborg - likely a limb-loss victim, a diabetic or epileptic patient, or a monkey. Prosthetic limbs are the cyborg "parts" that have probably made the most progress to date (I guess except for insulin implants), but they by no means are as good as a real limb just yet. Without going into too much details about current cyborg-y research, the main theme that unites most of it is the goal of regaining lost function. Limbs, kidneys, hearing and vision aids for those who have lost their natural counterparts.
Modern day cyborg |
Here's my point - I think that if we really want to one day have normal healthy individuals want to have cyborg augmentations and for those with impaired function to have comparable regain in function, we have to start portraying that kind of stuff as something not only useful and safe, but "hip". Basically, here is what I think may need to happen:
- Person/company (start up or already existing) comes up with a simple "second skin" or attachable electronic "implant" - a customizable tatoo, a UV measurement patch, a watch display - something that wouldn't be invasive and give some sort of benefit/function to the user, like a smartphone, that the user would like to have with them at all times. Lots of possibilities here.
- Have celebrities/show hosts/athletes/etc. use it and make it cool - or advertise a lot. The widespread use will be important to drive prices down and make it acceptable to people.
- Having a "rockstar" of the company/movement would be helpful - think Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg etc. Someone to represent and embody the movement and products.
- Come up with something slightly more invasive/complicated/useful and repeat steps 1 and 2... If the company/companies make a lot of money and the market opens up for competition - this will drive innovation for making cyborg implants for the common individual as well as those who are impaired.
One important obstacle here is that unlike Apple or Facebook, a company that makes implants will actually have to be more like a pharmaceutical or medical device company in the sense of the types of testing and research that it does. Once the implants have to actually be surgically implanted, there will need to be LOTS of testing done before a product comes out. BUT, if the company concurrently provides products which are minimally invasive and are safe, it will be able to make enough money to support the research on more complicated cyborg parts. That of course depends on the product being popular.
Borg? |
Of course, it will still be important to continue research to help those with lost function, and I think that if above company/companies were to make enough money to be able to do a wide variety of research, medically-relevant applications would be more feasible than they are today.
Anyways, this is just something I've been thinking about lately, and I think that would be one way towards a future where most humans are augmented in some way.
Anyone want to do this with me? :)
For your viewing pleasure!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=akaos1U8Rto
Okay.. that was a bit disturbing and possibly exaggerated, but it raises some concerns with encouraging this kind of cyborg evolution revolution. If these kinds of augmentations did become popular, we raise the standard of what the average human can do. If, for example, there were leg augmentations which could increase one's speed, and alot of people had such augmentations, then it would seem impractical to keep the old human legs. Even a weirder thought.. if are certain kind of leg augmentation became popular, everyone's maximum leg speed would be identical; governed by the specifications and properties of how the augmentations are manufactured. Wouldn't it be depressing if there was no longer a degree of improvement that can be reached? It is a little weird, but the limitations of a human being is something to be appreciated.
Much like what Syndrome said in The Incredibles, if you make everyone super, no one will be. Working with brain machine interfaces, I'm all over furthering the research of artificial limbs and stuff, but a part of me is worried (and I'll have to admit excited) about how we can disrupt disrupt our notion of humanity when we introduce these kinds of devices.
Random note, ever played Deus Ex HR? I haven't played it yet... but now you got me wanting to play it. (:o
Of course there's the eternal question of whether any such augmentations would make us "less human". And of course the whole human vs cyborg deal in any competition, sport, etc. I think that would get more complicated once we get to hardcore brain-only implants (ie memory enhancement, "telepathy" etc.).
DeleteWhile I doubt that all human beings on the planet would be able to get augmentations, I don't see this as THAT different than any other advantage people have over others - it would just be much more intimate. We're of course not talking about ideals here, just about realities. I'm sure in the future even if everyone was able to get augmentation, there would be, like in Deus Ex, people who are in principle against it. I did play it, but haven't finished it yet btw. It's a good game, and the augmentation aspect in it is actually realistic.
If our goal as a species is to advance ourselves and our society, then I think we will at least dabble in implants - whether that leads to confusion and cyborgs revolting and separating from humans or to a better future and more fulfilling life for everyone remains to be seen :D